Two percent is below benchmark for B2B SaaS - you should be hitting three to five percent. Let me guess - the site explains features but doesn't clearly communicate the transformation. Why should someone care?

We'd restructure the entire page flow. Hero with a clear value proposition - the outcome, not the feature. Social proof immediately below. Then a problem-agitation-solution flow that makes visitors think 'these people understand my pain.' Features come later, framed as solutions to specific problems.

That's why Framer is perfect for marketing teams. Once we build the site, your team makes changes directly - swap headlines, test new CTAs, update social proof. No agency ticket, no two-week wait. You could test a new hero headline every Monday morning.

We build with conversion tracking from day one - heatmaps, scroll depth, click tracking, and A/B testing capability. Within the first month you'll have data on exactly what's working. Then we iterate based on numbers, not opinions.

Dedicated landing pages per channel is the right call - you can match the messaging to the ad copy and track conversion by source. How many pages do you need?

In Framer we'd build a master template with the shared sections - product demo, testimonials, pricing - and then customise the hero, headline, and CTA for each audience. LinkedIn page leads with the strategic value, Google page leads with the problem, email page leads with what's new.

We'd have all three live in about ten days. Framer lets us clone and customise pages quickly. Plus, since the pages are independent, your team can tweak copy right up until launch day without touching anything else.

Absolutely. Each page gets its own UTM tracking, conversion events, and analytics. You'll see in real-time which channel is driving the most signups at what cost. Shift budget mid-campaign based on actual data.